When the movie directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali 'Bajirao - Mastani' was about to release, the havoc started saying the women of Peshve famliy never danced in the court. The was about the popular song 'Pinga' in which Bajorao's wife Kashibai and Mastani danced together. It can not be digested as Kashibai and Mastani never met in their life. The reference of their meet not found in history. But the 'True Lover true of history (of course 'so called') cried that who knows the real history. History is not that what the educated people of that time which were obviously from Brahmin community showed us in their literature. It is far different from the reality. I personally agree with this. But it doesn't mean that what we learn from History books is totally a fiction. And the history lover had all the rights to mold it as per their wish. And in the issue of 'Bajorao - Mastani' I supported the people who were opposing the fabricated history. 

Now the same thing is happening with the film 'Padmavati' as the directed made her danced on "Ghumar'. Padmavati was a princess and later she was the queen of Maha Rana Pratap. The Ghumar is the main dance of some other community. Padmavati could not dance on this theme but since Sanjay show it as he wanted Deepika to dance otherwise the audience will not crave for the tickets. It is cleared that he is a film maker and he wants his investments back, there is no absolute love for any History or reality. 
All these happened with the idols of high community, but what about the faulty documentation by the serials and that needed to mention, from Balaji Telefilms. Their child, the serial 'Chandra - Nandini' which is aired on Star Plus is showing the distorted picture of Chandra Gupta Maurya. Chandra Gupta was associated with Chanakya and this serial is not giving any place to the legendary character of history. The serial is showing faulty love story of Chandra Gupta and his enemy Nanda's daughter Nandini. The serial is showing the magic of Parakaya Pravesh means the magician can enter in anyone's body and make the things happen as he wants. Was this kind of magic existed in Maurya Era ? And Chankya could not recognize who was the real Chandra Gupta and who was the magician? It is all about the character Nandini who is the Hero (yes, not the heroine) of this soup. Chandra Gupta's son Bindusar hates Nandini as he think that she killed his mother Dushyala. But he loves Dharma, the niece of Nandini. As per the (Real) History Dharma is the mother of Bindusar's son Samrat Ashok. And the world knows that Samrat Ashok was the follower of Buddhism. 

When the country is crying for the historical distortion in the movies like Bajorao - Mastani and Padmavati, why Buddhist people are ignoring this fabrication with the legendary king and his family ?


On the other hand, One Ravidra Madhav Sathe is writing in Loksatta that Buddhism was finished due to Muslim Invasion. Mr. Ravindra Sathe is the member of Mhalgi Prabodhini and he is doing his job to make a differences in the Muslims and the other, it can be of any community. As per their agenda he showed the venomous thoughts of his party and sangha. But there is no revolt can be seen anywhere. It can be taken as good side of ignoring such comments but these people are spreading the toxic unhistorical seeds. This should not be nurtured. Ignoring is the best thing but we have to be very keen that our future will not blame us for not revolting for such a non sense and serving the wrong history for years.